It's such an amazing project, I wish it used something other than Guile but you can't have everything.
Zambyte 1 hours ago [-]
Other than Guile as in different Scheme implementations? It's usually not too difficult to port things between Schemes. Especially if you use standard R6RS or R7RS library syntax.
noosphr 58 minutes ago [-]
Guiles debugging has been a nightmare in the 3.x series. Which is rather surprising since it was probably the easiest scheme to debug in the 1.x days.
It got so bad I moved to racket as my daily driver.
wwfn 52 minutes ago [-]
Can you say more? Guile's the only scheme I've tried (attempts at packaging for Guix). Debugging has been difficult, but I figured it was me struggling with new tools and API. Does racket have better facilities for introspection or discovery at the REPL?
pjmlp 12 minutes ago [-]
Yes, since years, all the way when it was still known as Dr. Scheme.
It has a graphical experience similar to the survivors from Lisp is great days, like LispWorks and Allegro Common Lisp, or Clojure with Cursive.
pjmlp 14 minutes ago [-]
Even better than PLT Scheme with Dr. Scheme, now Raket has ever been?
I have my doubts, given its age.
feastingonslop 54 minutes ago [-]
Which LLM works best for Racket?
NeutralForest 18 minutes ago [-]
A different scheme that has great debugging and testing and also better docs.
It got so bad I moved to racket as my daily driver.
It has a graphical experience similar to the survivors from Lisp is great days, like LispWorks and Allegro Common Lisp, or Clojure with Cursive.
I have my doubts, given its age.